Grade: D
Spinzamo is a real, operating sweepstakes casino, but its record is poor enough that we would not call it a safe pick. SweepsGuard grades it D based on player complaints, operator conduct, and redemption reliability. That grade is our independent assessment, not a guarantee — read the site's own sweepstakes rules and check its complaint history before you deposit.
Spinzamo arrived in the summer of 2026 behind a cast of cartoon mascots and an invitation to join the "Spinzamo Squad." Behind the mascots is MAJIG Limited, an Isle of Man company registered on Hope Street in Douglas — the same company, at the same address, that runs SweepFan. The two sites share a rules template, a redemption structure, a restricted-state list, and even the same mail-in fulfillment box in Watertown, New York, so what we know about one bears directly on the other. Gold Coins are for play and Sweeps Coins redeem at a dollar each, but only once a player is holding a hundred of them. The mail-in route pays three Sweeps Coins per envelope. Under Rule 2.7, Sweeps Coins expire after 60 consecutive days with no Sweeps Coin play. Verification is document-based and extends to source of funds, and payouts go only to a bank account in the player's own name. It is open to U.S. residents outside thirteen excluded states, and not to players in Canada.
Spinzamo has almost nothing public. There is no Trustpilot profile for the site at all, and a search across the sweepstakes and gambling communities where players discuss these sites turned up nothing about it, a real absence rather than a broken search, since a control query run in the same batch returned results as expected. Complaints have now reached us and they are published below. Beyond that, nobody has publicly said whether a redemption arrives, how long verification takes, or what happens when someone asks for a large balance.
Its sibling site is the closest thing to evidence anyone has. In the second week of August, the first four public reviews of SweepFan appeared and split evenly. Two players confirmed being paid, one of them around eight hundred and fifty dollars, and both described live chat as quick and helpful. The other two did not get paid. One had a redemption declined and the account closed outright after depositing a hundred dollars. The other was told in writing that verification documents had been approved and payment was on its way, then received nothing and no further replies. Spinzamo is not SweepFan, but it is the same company running the same playbook from the same address, and anyone deciding whether to fund an account is entitled to weigh it.
Spinzamo's own record is set out below, case by case. In August 2026 a player from Oregon filed over a $142.22 redemption that went unpaid. We wrote to Spinzamo on August 31 and never received a reply. The player later told us Spinzamo had banned the account, voided the play and refunded the $80 he had spent, citing a rule against low risk wagering that the published terms do not define anywhere. He had bought the first purchase bonus offer three times, which is irregular on its face and which operators are entitled to act on, so the case is not one-sided. What we recorded against Spinzamo is the undisclosed term and the silence, not the decision to enforce a bonus rule. The site's terms were last revised at the start of July 2026, and there is still no public review or community discussion of it. Its sister brand went from no public feedback at all to four reviews in ten days, half of them describing money that was requested and never received. We wrote to that brand on July 31 and a person there did eventually come back to us in late August. Spinzamo itself has not answered any case since (see the updates below).
We are listing Spinzamo but we are not recommending it. The operator names itself and the one-time playthrough is player-friendly. Set against that: a published rules document that contradicts itself about the hundred-coin redemption minimum and carries an unrelated company's name in its arbitration clause, three complaints here that never drew a reply, and a sister brand with unresolved reports of players not being paid, one of them closed down at the redemption screen. That combination does not earn the benefit of the doubt on a site nobody has cashed out from yet. If you do play here, keep your balance low, redeem the moment you clear the threshold instead of letting a win accumulate, and keep every message support sends you about verification. If a redemption stalls or an account is closed while you are owed money, file a complaint with us and we will take it to the operator.
Update (Sep 9, 2026) — Cases #329, #346 and #358. Every published complaint against Spinzamo is now closed, and not one of them drew a reply. We wrote to their support address on August 25, August 31 and September 2, set a deadline of September 9 in the last of those, and heard nothing at any point. The shape is consistent across the players: a redemption is placed, it is rejected or voided, and the account is closed. Where money went back it was the player's own purchase returned as stake rather than the redemption being paid. Where Spinzamo gave a reason at all it was minimal or low risk wagering, a term its published terms do not define anywhere. In one of these the reason was given to a player on his first deposit at the site, where no wagering history existed for any pattern to be drawn from. Another closed on silence alone, because the operator never stated a ground that could be tested. Worth noting for anyone weighing this operator: MAJIG Limited, which runs Spinzamo, does answer us at its other brand SweepFan through that brand's ticket desk. On September 10 it said through the SweepFan desk that it would look into the Spinzamo cases, and nothing came of it.
Update (Sep 10, 2026) — Case #329. After that case had closed and published, the player told us Spinzamo refunded his purchases, $119.97 in total. That is his own money returning, not the $125.18 redemption he was owed, and it arrived only once the case was on the public record. It is the same shape already described above: the stake comes back, the redemption does not. The redemption remains unpaid, the account closure remains unexplained, and the recorded outcome stands.
Last updated: September 22, 2026
3 published complaints: 3 unresolved (1 no response, 2 resolved unfairly).
Full Spinzamo complaint history
Spinzamo's current SweepsGuard grade is D, as of September 22, 2026. SweepsGuard grades range from A (strong and reliable) to F (blacklisted).
You can file a free complaint against Spinzamo using SweepsGuard's complaint form at sweepsguard.com/submit-complaint. Submit your dispute with documentation and SweepsGuard mediates it with the operator, then publishes the outcome to Spinzamo's public record.